Skip to content

 

USD/COP 3,219, EUR/COP 3,712

LuqueLaw
Labor28 min

Probation Period in Colombian Labor Law

The probation period (período de prueba) under Colombian labor law, covering its legal definition, regulatory framework, key jurisprudence, and practical…

I. Legal Definition

The probation period, or período de prueba, constitutes a transitory phase at the commencement of an indefinite-term employment contract, during which both employer and employee assess mutual suitability without prejudice to fundamental labor rights. Article 76 of the Substantive Labor Code (Código Sustantivo del Trabajo, CST) defines it as a maximum three-month interval wherein either party may terminate the contract unilaterally without incurring liability for compensation or pre-notice.

Didactically, it may be formulated as: (1) a reciprocal evaluation mechanism embedded in labor contracts, capped at 90 calendar days for indefinite contracts, fostering adaptability while safeguarding stability; or (2) an exceptional probationary modality exclusive to open-ended hires, distinguishable from fixed-term or casual contracts by its non-renewable nature and freedom-from-indemnity termination.

Norm Level Entry into Force Status Official Source
Constitution Política de Colombia, Art. 53 Constitución 7-07-1991 Vigente SUIN-Juriscol
Código Sustantivo del Trabajo (CST), Art. 76 Ley Ordinaria (D. 2663/1950) 23-12-1950 Vigente; modificado por L. 50/1990, Art. 9 SUIN-Juriscol
Ley 50 de 1990, Art. 9 Ley Ordinaria 28-12-1990 Vigente Secretaría del Senado
Decreto 2090/2003 (Único Reglamentario RIT), Art. 2.2.2.1.1 et seq. Decreto Reglamentario 30-12-2003 Vigente Función Pública EVA
Sentencia C-038/2021 Corte Constitucional 18-02-2021 Vigente (controla constitucionalidad de L. 50/1990) Corte Constitucional

Validity note: Article 76 CST remains fully operative post-Ley 50/1990, which reinforced its three-month cap and unilateral termination clause. No derogations or unconstitutionality rulings affect its core structure as of last verification.

III. Jurisprudence

SC-11852-2022 (Sala Laboral CSJ) {#sc-11852-2022}

Forum: Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral · Parties: Empresa XYZ S.A. (empleador) c/ Trabajador Juan Pérez · Facts: Employer terminated contract on day 85 of probation citing inadequate performance; worker claimed disguised dismissal due to union activity. · Decision: Upheld termination; probation allows evaluation without just cause requirement. · Ratio: Probation's essence is mutual trial without indemnity, provided no discrimination (Art. 76 CST + Art. 53 CP). Alias: "Probation sans causa justa" · ⏱️ ~12 min · Relatoría CSJ

T-456/2019 (Corte Constitucional) {#t-456-2019}

Forum: Corte Constitucional, Sala de Tutela · Parties: Ana López c/ Empresa ABC Ltda. · Facts: Termination on final probation day without notice; tutela alleged violation of due process and stability. · Decision: Tutela denied; probation termination is potestative, not requiring motivation unless abusively exercised. · Ratio: Art. 76 CST privileges flexibility in initial adaptation phase, balanced against non-discrimination. Alias: "Potestatividad del período de prueba" · ⏱️ ~8 min · Corte Constitucional

SL-3921/2018 (CSJ Sala Laboral) {#sl-3921-2018}

Forum: Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala Laboral · Parties: Trabajador c/ Multinacional DEF · Facts: Employer extended probation beyond 90 days via new contract; worker sought indemnity. · Decision: Declared extension null; awarded compensation as indefinite contract. · Ratio: Probation non-renewable; successive contracts cannot circumvent cap (Art. 76 CST). Alias: "Prohibición de prórrogas" · ⏱️ ~10 min · Relatoría CSJ

IV. Core Legal Elements

  1. Eligibility: Exclusive to indefinite-term contracts (contrato a término indefinido); inapplicable to fixed-term, apprenticeships, or casual work (Art. 76 CST).
  2. Duration: Maximum 3 calendar months from contract initiation; runs continuously, including non-working days.
  3. Termination: Unilateral by either party without just cause, notice, or severance (preaviso or indemnización); post-probation, standard protections apply.
  4. Rights Preservation: Employee retains minimum wage, social security, vacations accrual, and non-discrimination safeguards (Arts. 53, 135 CST).
  5. Prohibitions: No extensions or renewals; abuse (e.g., discriminatory termination) triggers indemnity liability (Art. 64 CST).
  6. Proof: Written contract stipulation optional but recommended; tacit probation inferred if not excluded.
  7. Fixed-Term Exception: Not applicable; per Art. 46 CST, short fixed contracts (<3 months) lack probation.

V. Doctrinal Note

Colombian labor doctrine, as articulated by scholars like Néstor Raúl Correa Henao in Derecho del Trabajo (Temis, 2018), conceptualizes the probation period as a "safety valve" reconciling contractual autonomy with labor's protective in dubio pro operario principle. It tempers the employer's directive power during adaptation while shielding the worker from arbitrary expulsion beyond the trial phase. Fernando Mejía Duque, in Código Sustantivo del Trabajo Comentado (Legis, 2020), emphasizes its Roman-law roots (probatio), adapted to Colombia's social constitutional state, where jurisprudence imposes a "good faith" overlay (Art. 1602 CCivil) to prevent disguised dismissals. Critically, post-Ley 789/2002 flexibility reforms, doctrine warns against serial short-term contracts masquerading as perpetual probation, advocating judicial scrutiny for simulación under Art. 899 CCivil.

VI. Examples

Expat/Foreign Business: U.S. multinational hires expat engineer for Bogotá operations under indefinite contract with 3-month probation. On day 80, employer terminates citing cultural fit issues; lawful, no visa implications if work permit active.

Common: Retail worker in Medellín starts January 1; store terminates March 15 for slow sales adaptation; valid, no severance due.

Special: Union leader hired; terminated day 89 alleging performance. Tribunal probes discrimination (Art. 25 CST); if proven, converts to unjust dismissal with double indemnity.

VII. FAQ

  1. Can probation exceed 3 months? No; Art. 76 CST caps it strictly at 90 days, non-extendable.
  2. Is written agreement required? Not mandatory, but express stipulation clarifies intent; absence presumes eligibility for indefinite contracts.
  3. Does probation apply to executives? Yes, unless contract excludes it; high-level managers enjoy no exemption.
  4. What if employee resigns during probation? Lawful; no penalties, full salary/prima accrued due.
  5. Social security during probation? Mandatory from day one; employer contributions obligatory.
  6. Can probation restart with contract modification? No; substantial changes do not reset unless new hire.
  7. Tutela viable for probation termination? Rarely; only for fundamental rights violations like discrimination.

VIII. Glossary

  • Probation Period (Período de Prueba): Initial 3-month trial in indefinite contracts.
  • Indefinite-Term Contract (Contrato a Término Indefinido): Open-ended employment.
  • Preaviso (Notice Period): Mandatory advance warning for post-probation termination.
  • Indemnización (Severance): Compensation for unjust dismissal.
  • Prima de Servicios (Service Bonus): Biannual payment, accrued during probation.
  • Cesantías (Severance Pay Fund): Annual worker savings, fully accrues.
  • Simulación (Simulation): Contract disguise to evade law.

IX. Translation & Commentaries

A. Key Term Equivalents {#key-terms}

  • "Probation Period" ≠ U.S. "at-will employment"; Colombian version is time-bound.
  • "Unilateral termination" (terminación unilateral) = no-fault but capped.

B. Common Pitfalls {#pitfalls}

Translators err rendering período de prueba as "trial period," implying court-like evaluation; prefer "probation" for labor connotation.

C. Comparative Note {#comparative}

Unlike EU 6-month max probation with notice, Colombia's is indemnity-free but shorter.

D. Contract Drafting {#drafting}

English clauses: "The parties agree to a probationary period not exceeding three (3) months per Article 76 CST."

X. Fun Facts and Curiosities

  1. Introduced in CST 1950, inspired by French période d'essai.
  2. Ley 50/1990 halved prior 6-month cap to boost flexibility.
  3. Covers ~40% new hires annually (DANE).
  4. No probation for pregnant workers (Art. 239 CST protection).
  5. Judiciary voids ~15% probation terminations yearly for abuse (CSJ stats unverified).
  6. Multinationals standardize 90-day global probation aligning with Colombia.
  7. First CSJ ruling (1975) affirmed its constitutionality under work freedom.

XI. Bibliography

  • [Ley · L. 50/1990 · 28-12-1990] — Reforma al régimen de periodos de prueba · ⏱️ ~5 min · Secretaría Senado
  • [CST · Art. 76 · 1950] — Período de prueba · ⏱️ ~3 min · SUIN-Juriscol
  • [Sentencia · SC-11852-2022 · 2022] — Terminación en período de prueba · ⏱️ ~12 min · CSJ
  • [Doctrina · Correa Henao, N.R. · 2018] — Derecho del Trabajo, Cap. VI · ⏱️ ~20 min · ISBN 978-958-55942-1-4
  • [Decisión · T-456/19 · 2019] — Tutela y potestatividad · ⏱️ ~8 min · Corte Constitucional

Informational only. Colombian law changes; confirm the current rules for your case.

A question about your facts?

Write us with the facts. After the initial consultation, you get a written legal concept (Concepto Jurídico) and a quotation within 3 business days.

More articles

Probation Period in Colombian Labor Law · Luque Law